Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Stay of demand - pre-deposit of 20% of the demand - This proceedings issued by the assessing authority is in tune with Section 220(6) of the Act. Therefore, the petitioner need not construe that such insisting of 20% of the demand is a pre-deposit required for entertaining the appeal under Section 246A of the Act, but it is only a condition imposed by the assessing authority for grant of stay for the remaining amount of the demand under Section 220(6) of the Act. Therefore, for that reason the petitioner cannot once again challenge the impugned assessment order before this Court invoking the extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. - HC
Stay of demand - pre-deposit of 20% of the demand - This proceedings issued by the assessing authority is in tune with Section 220(6) of the Act. Therefore, the petitioner need not construe that such insisting of 20% of the demand is a pre-deposit required for entertaining the appeal under Section 246A of the Act, but it is only a condition imposed by the assessing authority for grant of stay for the remaining amount of the demand under Section 220(6) of the Act. Therefore, for that reason the petitioner cannot once again challenge the impugned assessment order before this Court invoking the extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
