Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Stay of demand - pre-deposit of 20% of the demand - This proceedings issued by the assessing authority is in tune with Section 220(6) of the Act. Therefore, the petitioner need not construe that such insisting of 20% of the demand is a pre-deposit required for entertaining the appeal under Section 246A of the Act, but it is only a condition imposed by the assessing authority for grant of stay for the remaining amount of the demand under Section 220(6) of the Act. Therefore, for that reason the petitioner cannot once again challenge the impugned assessment order before this Court invoking the extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. - HC
Stay of demand - pre-deposit of 20% of the demand - This proceedings issued by the assessing authority is in tune with Section 220(6) of the Act. Therefore, the petitioner need not construe that such insisting of 20% of the demand is a pre-deposit required for entertaining the appeal under Section 246A of the Act, but it is only a condition imposed by the assessing authority for grant of stay for the remaining amount of the demand under Section 220(6) of the Act. Therefore, for that reason the petitioner cannot once again challenge the impugned assessment order before this Court invoking the extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.