Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Liability of GST on tender bid and other successful bidders - it is submitted that instead of paying the tax by themselves, the respondents were demanding it from the petitioner, which is contrary to the provisions of the respective Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 - Having participated in the tender, it is not open for the bidder to say that the condition of the tender cannot be imposed - There is no merits in the present writ petition. Only remedy available to the petitioner is to approach the authority concerned under Section 54 of the respective GST enactments for refund of the GST collected from the petitioner in accordance with law. - HC
Liability of GST on tender bid and other successful bidders - it is submitted that instead of paying the tax by themselves, the respondents were demanding it from the petitioner, which is contrary to the provisions of the respective Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 - Having participated in the tender, it is not open for the bidder to say that the condition of the tender cannot be imposed - There is no merits in the present writ petition. Only remedy available to the petitioner is to approach the authority concerned under Section 54 of the respective GST enactments for refund of the GST collected from the petitioner in accordance with law. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.