Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Levy of penalty - When the audit was conducted, the appellant had paid service tax on the rent received as on 24.01.2012 in respect of the shops in the mall. This amount has already been appropriated. Thus, section 73(3) applies to this case and no SCN should have been issued - no case has been made out by the Revenue to justify the imposition of penalty upon the appellant under section 78 insofar as this part of the demand is concerned. - AT
Levy of penalty - When the audit was conducted, the appellant had paid service tax on the rent received as on 24.01.2012 in respect of the shops in the mall. This amount has already been appropriated. Thus, section 73(3) applies to this case and no SCN should have been issued - no case has been made out by the Revenue to justify the imposition of penalty upon the appellant under section 78 insofar as this part of the demand is concerned. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.