Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Input Tax Credit - petitioner has not fully complied with the requirements of Sub-Rule (1) and Sub-Rule (2) of Rule 38 of the Rules of 2006. - It is petitioner’s own admission and undisputed fact that various cash transactions were made and the authorities found that invoices in respect of various transactions were not issued - there are no ground to interfere with the impugned order in exercise of our revisional jurisdiction under Section 84 of the Act of 2003. - HC
Input Tax Credit - petitioner has not fully complied with the requirements of Sub-Rule (1) and Sub-Rule (2) of Rule 38 of the Rules of 2006. - It is petitioner’s own admission and undisputed fact that various cash transactions were made and the authorities found that invoices in respect of various transactions were not issued - there are no ground to interfere with the impugned order in exercise of our revisional jurisdiction under Section 84 of the Act of 2003. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.