Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Revision u/s 263 to impose a penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - CIT merely set aside the assessment order in its entirety and remanded the case for a fresh consideration by the assessing officer - Thus, while issuing the order of assessment the assessing officer was bestowed with all powers as in an original assessment, including the power to express his satisfaction for initiating penalty proceedings. - Writ petition dismissed - HC
Revision u/s 263 to impose a penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - CIT merely set aside the assessment order in its entirety and remanded the case for a fresh consideration by the assessing officer - Thus, while issuing the order of assessment the assessing officer was bestowed with all powers as in an original assessment, including the power to express his satisfaction for initiating penalty proceedings. - Writ petition dismissed - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
