Charitable trust income application permits verified capital expenditure but rejects deferred pre-operative claims and requires reconsideration of con...
Reinsurance premium deductions require established regulatory breaches, while independently acquired software qualifies within the computer depreciati...
Insolvency and BankruptcyFebruary 15, 2022Case LawsHC
Jurisdiction to entertain the complaint filed by the respondents - which class of Special Courts, created by Companies Act (amendment) 2017, is empowered to try the offences under the I.B. Code? - it is clear that Special Court comprising of a Metropolitan Magistrate “Issue Process”, under Section ”, under Section or Judicial Magistrate First Class is to try “Issue Process”, under Section other offences”, under Section. The phrase other offences contained in section 435 (2) (b), “Issue Process”, under Section ”, under Section in contradistinction to section 435 (2) (a) of CA 2013, would include (1) offences under the I.B. Code, and (2) offences under the CA 2013 but carrying punishment of imprisonment of less than two years. - HC
Jurisdiction to entertain the complaint filed by the respondents - which class of Special Courts, created by Companies Act (amendment) 2017, is empowered to try the offences under the I.B. Code? - it is clear that Special Court comprising of a Metropolitan Magistrate “Issue Process”, under Section ”, under Section or Judicial Magistrate First Class is to try “Issue Process”, under Section other offences”, under Section. The phrase other offences contained in section 435 (2) (b), “Issue Process”, under Section ”, under Section in contradistinction to section 435 (2) (a) of CA 2013, would include (1) offences under the I.B. Code, and (2) offences under the CA 2013 but carrying punishment of imprisonment of less than two years. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
