Retroactive interim-moratorium exclusion permits protective asset disclosure and preservation measures against personal guarantors pending arbitration...
Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Insolvency and BankruptcyFebruary 15, 2022Case LawsHC
Jurisdiction to entertain the complaint filed by the respondents - which class of Special Courts, created by Companies Act (amendment) 2017, is empowered to try the offences under the I.B. Code? - it is clear that Special Court comprising of a Metropolitan Magistrate “Issue Process”, under Section ”, under Section or Judicial Magistrate First Class is to try “Issue Process”, under Section other offences”, under Section. The phrase other offences contained in section 435 (2) (b), “Issue Process”, under Section ”, under Section in contradistinction to section 435 (2) (a) of CA 2013, would include (1) offences under the I.B. Code, and (2) offences under the CA 2013 but carrying punishment of imprisonment of less than two years. - HC
Jurisdiction to entertain the complaint filed by the respondents - which class of Special Courts, created by Companies Act (amendment) 2017, is empowered to try the offences under the I.B. Code? - it is clear that Special Court comprising of a Metropolitan Magistrate “Issue Process”, under Section ”, under Section or Judicial Magistrate First Class is to try “Issue Process”, under Section other offences”, under Section. The phrase other offences contained in section 435 (2) (b), “Issue Process”, under Section ”, under Section in contradistinction to section 435 (2) (a) of CA 2013, would include (1) offences under the I.B. Code, and (2) offences under the CA 2013 but carrying punishment of imprisonment of less than two years. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
