Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Addition u/s 68 - The Tribunal not only took note of the legal position but also the factual position. The Tribunal held that the legal effect after amalgamation of the 14 companies with the assessee company is that the amalgamating companies loses its identity and since the assessee company is different juristic entity, cannot be taxed by applying Section 68 of the Act for the share capital and premium which these 14 amalgamating companies have shown in their respective books from financial year 2008-09 onwards.- HC
Addition u/s 68 - The Tribunal not only took note of the legal position but also the factual position. The Tribunal held that the legal effect after amalgamation of the 14 companies with the assessee company is that the amalgamating companies loses its identity and since the assessee company is different juristic entity, cannot be taxed by applying Section 68 of the Act for the share capital and premium which these 14 amalgamating companies have shown in their respective books from financial year 2008-09 onwards.- HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.