Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Addition u/s 68 - The Tribunal not only took note of the legal position but also the factual position. The Tribunal held that the legal effect after amalgamation of the 14 companies with the assessee company is that the amalgamating companies loses its identity and since the assessee company is different juristic entity, cannot be taxed by applying Section 68 of the Act for the share capital and premium which these 14 amalgamating companies have shown in their respective books from financial year 2008-09 onwards.- HC
Addition u/s 68 - The Tribunal not only took note of the legal position but also the factual position. The Tribunal held that the legal effect after amalgamation of the 14 companies with the assessee company is that the amalgamating companies loses its identity and since the assessee company is different juristic entity, cannot be taxed by applying Section 68 of the Act for the share capital and premium which these 14 amalgamating companies have shown in their respective books from financial year 2008-09 onwards.- HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.