Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Threshold exemption excludes exempt services, while stamp-paper purchases avoid reverse charge; consequential service tax penalties were also set asid...
Grant of export incentives under Merchandise Exports from India Scheme (MEIS) - seeking reopening of online portal to allow the petitioner to rectify the inadvertent error - It must be noted that "to err is human” and wherever such bonafide mistakes have happened procedures so designed ought to provide for a way to rectify such bonafide mistakes. An error arising out of lapse and where parties seek to have the same rectified, the system must accommodate necessary procedure to rectify it. - While noticing that mistake that has happened is a technical mistake and is bonafide, on such technicalities, to deny substantive relief to the petitioner would amount to denial of justice - HC
Grant of export incentives under Merchandise Exports from India Scheme (MEIS) - seeking reopening of online portal to allow the petitioner to rectify the inadvertent error - It must be noted that "to err is human” and wherever such bonafide mistakes have happened procedures so designed ought to provide for a way to rectify such bonafide mistakes. An error arising out of lapse and where parties seek to have the same rectified, the system must accommodate necessary procedure to rectify it. - While noticing that mistake that has happened is a technical mistake and is bonafide, on such technicalities, to deny substantive relief to the petitioner would amount to denial of justice - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.