Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Food supplement classification requires common parlance and authoritative tests, preventing treatment as proprietary Ayurvedic medicines without suppo...
Grant of export incentives under Merchandise Exports from India Scheme (MEIS) - seeking reopening of online portal to allow the petitioner to rectify the inadvertent error - It must be noted that "to err is human” and wherever such bonafide mistakes have happened procedures so designed ought to provide for a way to rectify such bonafide mistakes. An error arising out of lapse and where parties seek to have the same rectified, the system must accommodate necessary procedure to rectify it. - While noticing that mistake that has happened is a technical mistake and is bonafide, on such technicalities, to deny substantive relief to the petitioner would amount to denial of justice - HC
Grant of export incentives under Merchandise Exports from India Scheme (MEIS) - seeking reopening of online portal to allow the petitioner to rectify the inadvertent error - It must be noted that "to err is human” and wherever such bonafide mistakes have happened procedures so designed ought to provide for a way to rectify such bonafide mistakes. An error arising out of lapse and where parties seek to have the same rectified, the system must accommodate necessary procedure to rectify it. - While noticing that mistake that has happened is a technical mistake and is bonafide, on such technicalities, to deny substantive relief to the petitioner would amount to denial of justice - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.