Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Reversal of CENVAT Credit - capital goods cleared as scrap - The appellant, being an output service provider, was not required to pay any amount in terms of rule 3(5A) of the Credit Rules during the period involved in the present appeal for clearance of capital goods as scrap. - The capital goods cleared as ‘scrap’ by the appellant are scrap and, therefore, the appellant, being an output service provider, was not required to pay any amount in terms of rule 3(5A) of the Credit Rules. - AT
Reversal of CENVAT Credit - capital goods cleared as scrap - The appellant, being an output service provider, was not required to pay any amount in terms of rule 3(5A) of the Credit Rules during the period involved in the present appeal for clearance of capital goods as scrap. - The capital goods cleared as ‘scrap’ by the appellant are scrap and, therefore, the appellant, being an output service provider, was not required to pay any amount in terms of rule 3(5A) of the Credit Rules. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.