Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Insolvency and BankruptcyJanuary 31, 2022Case LawsAT
Validity of Direction to place Settlement Proposal, sent by Respondent No. 1 before the CoC for its consideration - Considering the ratio of the Judgement of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Ebix Singapore, "there was no scope for negotiations between the parties once the CoC has approved the Resolution Plan. Thus, contractual principles and common law remedies, which do not find a rope in the wording or the intent of the IBC, cannot be imported in the intervening period between the acceptance of the CoC Approved Resolution Plan and the Approval by the Adjudicating Authority. - AT
Validity of Direction to place Settlement Proposal, sent by Respondent No. 1 before the CoC for its consideration - Considering the ratio of the Judgement of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Ebix Singapore, "there was no scope for negotiations between the parties once the CoC has approved the Resolution Plan. Thus, contractual principles and common law remedies, which do not find a rope in the wording or the intent of the IBC, cannot be imported in the intervening period between the acceptance of the CoC Approved Resolution Plan and the Approval by the Adjudicating Authority. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.