Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Insolvency and BankruptcyJanuary 31, 2022Case LawsAT
Seeking extension of four weeks’ time for making payment - Appellant failed to adhere to its commitment in Resolution Plan - by granting 30 days’ time to Appellant to comply its all financial obligations in Resolution Plan and make payment of balance of ₹ 30 crores shall not cause any prejudice to Financial Creditors, who have already been denied the said payment for a long period of time. In event, the Appellant is unable to make the payment as prayed for, it shall be open to proceed with the liquidation, no option being left thereafter. - AT
Seeking extension of four weeks’ time for making payment - Appellant failed to adhere to its commitment in Resolution Plan - by granting 30 days’ time to Appellant to comply its all financial obligations in Resolution Plan and make payment of balance of ₹ 30 crores shall not cause any prejudice to Financial Creditors, who have already been denied the said payment for a long period of time. In event, the Appellant is unable to make the payment as prayed for, it shall be open to proceed with the liquidation, no option being left thereafter. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
