Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Penalty u/s. 271B - absence of auditing u/s. 44AB - The very fact that the assessee got its accounts audited under the Cooperative Societies Act prima facie shows that it entertained a bona fide belief that the amount of grant-in-aid received from Government of Maharashtra was not includible for the purposes of computing turnover u/s. 44AB. - Since the penalty section is covered u/s. 273B, we hold that the penalty was not required to be levied and confirmed. - AT
Penalty u/s. 271B - absence of auditing u/s. 44AB - The very fact that the assessee got its accounts audited under the Cooperative Societies Act prima facie shows that it entertained a bona fide belief that the amount of grant-in-aid received from Government of Maharashtra was not includible for the purposes of computing turnover u/s. 44AB. - Since the penalty section is covered u/s. 273B, we hold that the penalty was not required to be levied and confirmed. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.