Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Detention of goods alongwith vehicle - gold ornaments - confiscation of goods - proceedings initiated under Section 129 as well as under Section 130 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act 2017 - Whether the transport of gold was with an intention to evade tax or not is a matter which requires appreciation of disputed facts and hence the statutory authority will have to consider the same after appreciating the facts. - This is not a fit case for invoking the extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Hence there is no merit in this writ petition - HC
Detention of goods alongwith vehicle - gold ornaments - confiscation of goods - proceedings initiated under Section 129 as well as under Section 130 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act 2017 - Whether the transport of gold was with an intention to evade tax or not is a matter which requires appreciation of disputed facts and hence the statutory authority will have to consider the same after appreciating the facts. - This is not a fit case for invoking the extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Hence there is no merit in this writ petition - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.