Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
Validity of assessment made under Section 143(1) instead of section 153C - In the facts of the present appeal, undisputedly, the books of account/documents/assets found during the search and seizure operation were received by the AO having jurisdiction over the assessee - Neither the AO has recorded any satisfaction nor issued any notice as contemplated under section 153C - The impugned assessment order passed under section 143(3) of the Act is invalid. - AT
Validity of assessment made under Section 143(1) instead of section 153C - In the facts of the present appeal, undisputedly, the books of account/documents/assets found during the search and seizure operation were received by the AO having jurisdiction over the assessee - Neither the AO has recorded any satisfaction nor issued any notice as contemplated under section 153C - The impugned assessment order passed under section 143(3) of the Act is invalid. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.