Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Exemption u/s 54 /54F - investment made in the name of the asssessee’s wife - The right of a person, may be one half, in the residential house cannot be taken away without due process of law or it continues till there is a partition of such residential house. With great respect, this judgment would not be of any assistance to the Revenue to deny the benefit to the assessee since there is no such co-ownership or share in the property of Domlur house by the assessee. Even Section 27 of the Act could be of little assistance to the Department since the said definition contemplated is only for the purposes of Section 22 to 26 of the Act. - HC
Exemption u/s 54 /54F - investment made in the name of the asssessee’s wife - The right of a person, may be one half, in the residential house cannot be taken away without due process of law or it continues till there is a partition of such residential house. With great respect, this judgment would not be of any assistance to the Revenue to deny the benefit to the assessee since there is no such co-ownership or share in the property of Domlur house by the assessee. Even Section 27 of the Act could be of little assistance to the Department since the said definition contemplated is only for the purposes of Section 22 to 26 of the Act. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Join Channel 
