Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Refund of IGST - There is a direct binding decision of this Court, which is rendered in favour of the assessee holding the assessee entitled to the refund of IGST. Despite the aforesaid decision of this Court in the case of Amit Cotton Industries [2020 (12) TMI 1116 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT], for the reasons best known to the adjudicating authority, the adjudicating authority has failed to abide by the aforesaid decision and has chosen not to take decision with regard to the refund of IGST. - the stand of the respondent Authority to withhold IGST based on non-consideration of Judicial pronouncement is equally irrational and arbitrary. - Refund allowed with 9% interest - HC
Refund of IGST - There is a direct binding decision of this Court, which is rendered in favour of the assessee holding the assessee entitled to the refund of IGST. Despite the aforesaid decision of this Court in the case of Amit Cotton Industries [2020 (12) TMI 1116 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT], for the reasons best known to the adjudicating authority, the adjudicating authority has failed to abide by the aforesaid decision and has chosen not to take decision with regard to the refund of IGST. - the stand of the respondent Authority to withhold IGST based on non-consideration of Judicial pronouncement is equally irrational and arbitrary. - Refund allowed with 9% interest - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
