Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Refund claim - time limitation - it is claimed that tax was paid by mistake on account of non-supply of any service either wholly or partially - The option available to the petitioner was to request its customer/client to issue an appropriate credit notes to neutrilize the alleged excess payment of GST while generating and issuing invoices dated 01.11.2017 details of which was captured in their regular return and tax was paid - refund claim filed by the petitioner is clearly barred under the limitation prescribed u/s 54(1) of the respective enactments read with explanation (h). - HC
Refund claim - time limitation - it is claimed that tax was paid by mistake on account of non-supply of any service either wholly or partially - The option available to the petitioner was to request its customer/client to issue an appropriate credit notes to neutrilize the alleged excess payment of GST while generating and issuing invoices dated 01.11.2017 details of which was captured in their regular return and tax was paid - refund claim filed by the petitioner is clearly barred under the limitation prescribed u/s 54(1) of the respective enactments read with explanation (h). - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.