Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Valuation of imported goods - loading of 10.5% to the assessable value - they had furnished the value of goods imported from the related supplier as also the value of those from unrelated suppliers and, for each year between 2012-13 and 2015-16, ranged from 44.42% to 45.07% despite which the first appellate authority has, by referring to ₹ 9.80 crores of import from related suppliers, held those to be 87.5% of the procurement. - The decision of the first appellate authority has been based on foundations which remain unverifiable and is of indeterminate origin. - Matter restored back. - AT
Valuation of imported goods - loading of 10.5% to the assessable value - they had furnished the value of goods imported from the related supplier as also the value of those from unrelated suppliers and, for each year between 2012-13 and 2015-16, ranged from 44.42% to 45.07% despite which the first appellate authority has, by referring to ₹ 9.80 crores of import from related suppliers, held those to be 87.5% of the procurement. - The decision of the first appellate authority has been based on foundations which remain unverifiable and is of indeterminate origin. - Matter restored back. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.