Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Time limitation for imposing penalty u/s 10-A of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Even though no limitation period as such has been indicated in Section 10-A of the CST Act it does not mean that the Department can decide arbitrarily to invoke to the power thereunder to levy penalty at any time of its choosing. - Considering that the maximum period for reopening an assessment under the CST Act is seven years, and that too in the case of proven fraud, and considering that in this case there is nothing on record to show that the Petitioner indulged in a fraud, the period for which the penalty can be permitted to be imposed cannot exceed three years prior the date of the order imposing penalty. - HC
Time limitation for imposing penalty u/s 10-A of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Even though no limitation period as such has been indicated in Section 10-A of the CST Act it does not mean that the Department can decide arbitrarily to invoke to the power thereunder to levy penalty at any time of its choosing. - Considering that the maximum period for reopening an assessment under the CST Act is seven years, and that too in the case of proven fraud, and considering that in this case there is nothing on record to show that the Petitioner indulged in a fraud, the period for which the penalty can be permitted to be imposed cannot exceed three years prior the date of the order imposing penalty. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
