Prospective valuation amendment limits reassessment: unamended fair market value reference could not justify reopening based on a registered valuer's ...
Exemption for examination-related services rejected where recipients were commercial entities; suppression sustained extended limitation and penalties...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1501 to 1520 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Maintainability of appeal - pre-deposit of the amount of certain percentage of duty demanded or penalty imposed - Perusal of section 35F of Central Excise Act, 1944 makes it apparent and clear that the requirement of this section is mandatory requirement and the failure thereof results in rejection of appeal ‘in limine’ - matter be remanded back to the Commissioner (Appeals) with the direction to the appellant to make good the absence of payment of amount of mandatory pre deposit prior for the appeal being heard by Commissioner (Appeals) - AT
Maintainability of appeal - pre-deposit of the amount of certain percentage of duty demanded or penalty imposed - Perusal of section 35F of Central Excise Act, 1944 makes it apparent and clear that the requirement of this section is mandatory requirement and the failure thereof results in rejection of appeal ‘in limine’ - matter be remanded back to the Commissioner (Appeals) with the direction to the appellant to make good the absence of payment of amount of mandatory pre deposit prior for the appeal being heard by Commissioner (Appeals) - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.