Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Maintainability of appeal - pre-deposit of the amount of certain percentage of duty demanded or penalty imposed - Perusal of section 35F of Central Excise Act, 1944 makes it apparent and clear that the requirement of this section is mandatory requirement and the failure thereof results in rejection of appeal ‘in limine’ - matter be remanded back to the Commissioner (Appeals) with the direction to the appellant to make good the absence of payment of amount of mandatory pre deposit prior for the appeal being heard by Commissioner (Appeals) - AT
Maintainability of appeal - pre-deposit of the amount of certain percentage of duty demanded or penalty imposed - Perusal of section 35F of Central Excise Act, 1944 makes it apparent and clear that the requirement of this section is mandatory requirement and the failure thereof results in rejection of appeal ‘in limine’ - matter be remanded back to the Commissioner (Appeals) with the direction to the appellant to make good the absence of payment of amount of mandatory pre deposit prior for the appeal being heard by Commissioner (Appeals) - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.