Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Addition u/s. 56(2)(vii) - difference between the stamp duty guideline value and purchase consideration i.e. 50 percent u/s 56(2)(vii)(b) - the Department cannot be allowed a second inning by sending the matter back to the Assessing Officer enabling the revenue to fill the lacunae and shortcomings and further putting the assessee to face a re-trail for no fault of him and to prove before the Assessing Officer that the sale consideration was the fair market value of the property purchased by him - We delete the addition made by the AO u/s. 56(2)(vii)(b) of the Act. - AT
Addition u/s. 56(2)(vii) - difference between the stamp duty guideline value and purchase consideration i.e. 50 percent u/s 56(2)(vii)(b) - the Department cannot be allowed a second inning by sending the matter back to the Assessing Officer enabling the revenue to fill the lacunae and shortcomings and further putting the assessee to face a re-trail for no fault of him and to prove before the Assessing Officer that the sale consideration was the fair market value of the property purchased by him - We delete the addition made by the AO u/s. 56(2)(vii)(b) of the Act. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
