Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Condonation of delay in filing appeal - appeal has been rejected as being filed beyond the stipulated period without any genuine reason - Catena of decisions have already held that there cannot be straight jacket formula to define the word ‘sufficient cause’ or which can be applied to all cases without reference to the peculiar facts and facts and circumstances of a given case. - In the present matter since there is no substantial delay nor it was beyond such period as was not condonable by Commissioner (Appeals). - Commissioner (Appeals) has failed to observe proviso to section 85 (3) A of the Finance Act, 1994. - AT
Condonation of delay in filing appeal - appeal has been rejected as being filed beyond the stipulated period without any genuine reason - Catena of decisions have already held that there cannot be straight jacket formula to define the word ‘sufficient cause’ or which can be applied to all cases without reference to the peculiar facts and facts and circumstances of a given case. - In the present matter since there is no substantial delay nor it was beyond such period as was not condonable by Commissioner (Appeals). - Commissioner (Appeals) has failed to observe proviso to section 85 (3) A of the Finance Act, 1994. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.