Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Levy of penalty u/s 114A of Customs Act, 1962 - In the present case, the appellant has been allowed to redeem the goods on payment of payment of duty. The appellant has later at the time of hearing of the appeal opted to abandon the goods. This does not in any way absolve the allegations of misdeclarations confirmed and upheld by the impugned order. The appellant imported prohibited goods which were absolutely confiscated. The goods which were allowed to be redeemed were also found to be undeclared / misdeclared for which penalty is imposable under Section 114A of the Customs Act. - AT
Levy of penalty u/s 114A of Customs Act, 1962 - In the present case, the appellant has been allowed to redeem the goods on payment of payment of duty. The appellant has later at the time of hearing of the appeal opted to abandon the goods. This does not in any way absolve the allegations of misdeclarations confirmed and upheld by the impugned order. The appellant imported prohibited goods which were absolutely confiscated. The goods which were allowed to be redeemed were also found to be undeclared / misdeclared for which penalty is imposable under Section 114A of the Customs Act. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
