Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Whether the amount deposited under protest prior to an order of assessment can be adjusted against the mandatory pre-deposit required for filing an appeal? - Section 26(6A) of the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act 2002 - The amount which has been deposited by the appellant anterior to the order of assessment cannot be excluded from consideration, in the absence of statutory language to that effect. A taxing statute must be construed strictly and literally. There is no room for intendment. - SC
Whether the amount deposited under protest prior to an order of assessment can be adjusted against the mandatory pre-deposit required for filing an appeal? - Section 26(6A) of the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act 2002 - The amount which has been deposited by the appellant anterior to the order of assessment cannot be excluded from consideration, in the absence of statutory language to that effect. A taxing statute must be construed strictly and literally. There is no room for intendment. - SC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.