Pure reimbursement without income element escapes tax withholding, while delayed withholding and unsupported provisions face deferred or renewed scrut...
Public benefit requirement defeats charitable registration where residents' association services are reciprocal, member-only facilities governed by mu...
Exempt-income expenditure disallowance is confined to investments that actually generated exempt income, while supported business expenses remain dedu...
Objective characteristics and principal use govern mining-tyre classification, while fresh advance ruling applications may rely on additional technica...
Administrative fraud classification suspension does not halt independent criminal investigation or warrant-based searches into alleged economic offenc...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
761 to 780 of 96046 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Penalty u/s 272A(2)(k) - assessee did not file its quarterly TDS returns within the prescribed time limit and there was a delay - In the given case, the assessee did not assess the liability under TDS provisions and subsequent to the survey, he blindly followed the instructions of the officers and remitted the liability in cash through SBI without taking any details of determination of liability. - Subsequently, the assessee could not comply with the filing of quarterly returns and made to pay the same amount again. The above situation clearly proves the reasonable cause. - AT
Penalty u/s 272A(2)(k) - assessee did not file its quarterly TDS returns within the prescribed time limit and there was a delay - In the given case, the assessee did not assess the liability under TDS provisions and subsequent to the survey, he blindly followed the instructions of the officers and remitted the liability in cash through SBI without taking any details of determination of liability. - Subsequently, the assessee could not comply with the filing of quarterly returns and made to pay the same amount again. The above situation clearly proves the reasonable cause. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.