Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Penalty u/s 272A(2)(k) - assessee did not file its quarterly TDS returns within the prescribed time limit and there was a delay - In the given case, the assessee did not assess the liability under TDS provisions and subsequent to the survey, he blindly followed the instructions of the officers and remitted the liability in cash through SBI without taking any details of determination of liability. - Subsequently, the assessee could not comply with the filing of quarterly returns and made to pay the same amount again. The above situation clearly proves the reasonable cause. - AT
Penalty u/s 272A(2)(k) - assessee did not file its quarterly TDS returns within the prescribed time limit and there was a delay - In the given case, the assessee did not assess the liability under TDS provisions and subsequent to the survey, he blindly followed the instructions of the officers and remitted the liability in cash through SBI without taking any details of determination of liability. - Subsequently, the assessee could not comply with the filing of quarterly returns and made to pay the same amount again. The above situation clearly proves the reasonable cause. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
