Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Penalty u/s 272A(2)(k) - assessee did not file its quarterly TDS returns within the prescribed time limit and there was a delay - In the given case, the assessee did not assess the liability under TDS provisions and subsequent to the survey, he blindly followed the instructions of the officers and remitted the liability in cash through SBI without taking any details of determination of liability. - Subsequently, the assessee could not comply with the filing of quarterly returns and made to pay the same amount again. The above situation clearly proves the reasonable cause. - AT
Penalty u/s 272A(2)(k) - assessee did not file its quarterly TDS returns within the prescribed time limit and there was a delay - In the given case, the assessee did not assess the liability under TDS provisions and subsequent to the survey, he blindly followed the instructions of the officers and remitted the liability in cash through SBI without taking any details of determination of liability. - Subsequently, the assessee could not comply with the filing of quarterly returns and made to pay the same amount again. The above situation clearly proves the reasonable cause. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
