Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 96046 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Initiation of reassessment proceedings, u/s.148 of the Act and issued notice to the assessee was based on valid reason on the strength of new tangible material which was not before the AO during the original assessment proceedings. Therefore, we are unable to see any ambiguity, perversity or invalidity in the action of the AO in initiating reassessment proceedings, issuing notice u/s.148 of the Act and framing reassessment order u/s.143(3) r.w.s.147 of the Act. - AT
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Initiation of reassessment proceedings, u/s.148 of the Act and issued notice to the assessee was based on valid reason on the strength of new tangible material which was not before the AO during the original assessment proceedings. Therefore, we are unable to see any ambiguity, perversity or invalidity in the action of the AO in initiating reassessment proceedings, issuing notice u/s.148 of the Act and framing reassessment order u/s.143(3) r.w.s.147 of the Act. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.