Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Levy of late fee charges - provision for purging the Bill of Entry - In fact, the expression purging is neither found in the Act nor in the aforesaid Regulation. Therefore, question of imposing late fee chargers merely because an importer files a second Bill of Entry on account of the factors mentioned above would not justify the levy of late fee charges on the petitioner. - Further it is noticed that in the impugned communication the amount was being demanded as a fine amount and not a late fee in terms of Regulation 4(3) - This writ petition is allowed by quashing the impugned order seeking to levy fine late fee - HC
Levy of late fee charges - provision for purging the Bill of Entry - In fact, the expression purging is neither found in the Act nor in the aforesaid Regulation. Therefore, question of imposing late fee chargers merely because an importer files a second Bill of Entry on account of the factors mentioned above would not justify the levy of late fee charges on the petitioner. - Further it is noticed that in the impugned communication the amount was being demanded as a fine amount and not a late fee in terms of Regulation 4(3) - This writ petition is allowed by quashing the impugned order seeking to levy fine late fee - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.