Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Absolute Confiscation - import of shoes - mis-declaration of the goods in terms of quantity and value - the impugned goods have violated the IPR and the import of these goods was, therefore, prohibited under Rule 6 read with Section 11. - As the seizure of the goods and suspension of the clearance was based on the IPR already registered with the Customs, it is covered under Rule 7(1)(a) and not under Rule 7(1)(b). - confiscation of these goods under section 111(l) in the order of the original authority affirmed in the impugned order is correct and proper - AT
Absolute Confiscation - import of shoes - mis-declaration of the goods in terms of quantity and value - the impugned goods have violated the IPR and the import of these goods was, therefore, prohibited under Rule 6 read with Section 11. - As the seizure of the goods and suspension of the clearance was based on the IPR already registered with the Customs, it is covered under Rule 7(1)(a) and not under Rule 7(1)(b). - confiscation of these goods under section 111(l) in the order of the original authority affirmed in the impugned order is correct and proper - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
