Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
Page of 4830
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
181 to 200 of 96587 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Absolute Confiscation - import of shoes - mis-declaration of the goods in terms of quantity and value - the impugned goods have violated the IPR and the import of these goods was, therefore, prohibited under Rule 6 read with Section 11. - As the seizure of the goods and suspension of the clearance was based on the IPR already registered with the Customs, it is covered under Rule 7(1)(a) and not under Rule 7(1)(b). - confiscation of these goods under section 111(l) in the order of the original authority affirmed in the impugned order is correct and proper - AT
Absolute Confiscation - import of shoes - mis-declaration of the goods in terms of quantity and value - the impugned goods have violated the IPR and the import of these goods was, therefore, prohibited under Rule 6 read with Section 11. - As the seizure of the goods and suspension of the clearance was based on the IPR already registered with the Customs, it is covered under Rule 7(1)(a) and not under Rule 7(1)(b). - confiscation of these goods under section 111(l) in the order of the original authority affirmed in the impugned order is correct and proper - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4830 
Join Channel 
