Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Validity of appointing Special Audit u/s 142(2A) - In the present case, the proceedings dated 09.12.2011 was treated as a show cause notice for all purposes both by the AO and by the Assessee/petitioner and the petitioner submitted his objections in detail on 15.12.2011 and thereafter, the approval from the CIT was obtained and the objections were disposed of on 16.12.2011. The further objections raised on 23.12.2011, were also disposed of by the AO - there is no reason to disbelieve the proceedings dated 09.12.2011, though it was not aptly worded - HC
Validity of appointing Special Audit u/s 142(2A) - In the present case, the proceedings dated 09.12.2011 was treated as a show cause notice for all purposes both by the AO and by the Assessee/petitioner and the petitioner submitted his objections in detail on 15.12.2011 and thereafter, the approval from the CIT was obtained and the objections were disposed of on 16.12.2011. The further objections raised on 23.12.2011, were also disposed of by the AO - there is no reason to disbelieve the proceedings dated 09.12.2011, though it was not aptly worded - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.