Loading...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    Resolution professional remarks partly sustained as delay in filings stood proved, but progress-report and canvassing allegations failed.
    Scheme implementation cannot dilute criminal prosecution; attached assets may be released for investors while charges continue independently.
    Completed auction sale fixes pre-GST tax liability; later GST cannot replace contractual tax terms for timber purchase.
    Section 74 notices need disclosed fraud grounds; absence of hearing and reasons also vitiated GST adjudication.
    GST appeal pre-deposit adjustment must be examined under the portal manual and the VVF (India) principle
    Section 74 demands express allegations of fraud or suppression; vague notices cannot sustain proceedings and orders were set aside.
    Bona fide GST return corrections cannot be rejected merely because earlier disclosures are being amended; notice quashed.
    Tax deduction at source remains mandatory; interim withholding relief refused while advance ruling applications were treated as withdrawn.
    Accrued liability for post-retirement annuity premium is deductible when it secures an existing contractual obligation.
    Reassessment beyond four years barred absent failure of disclosure; reopening on same material was only a change of opinion.
    Penny stock capital gains additions fail where documentary evidence is unrebutted and no specific material proves manipulation.
    Buy-back as corporate reorganisation under the India-Netherlands DTAA keeps gains outside Indian tax when shareholding stays within the group.
    Reassessment notice issued beyond three years needs PCCIT approval under section 151(ii); PCIT sanction was held insufficient.
    ESOP cross-charge deductible as revenue expenditure under section 37(1), following binding precedent on employee compensation.
    Telecom tax disputes: ITAT deleted major transfer pricing and revenue disallowances, while upholding tax on liabilities written back.
    Commercial expediency supports deduction of corporate guarantee settlement payment as business expenditure.
    Section 54 exemption upheld on part performance and possession despite an unregistered property agreement.
    TNMM comparability and foreign tax credit verification shape software transfer pricing relief and working capital adjustment
    Rejection of declared value upheld on forged consent and similar-goods valuation; duplicate penalty on proprietary concern set aside.
    Declared transaction value must be rejected first before enhancement of import valuation under customs law.
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Highlights
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

whatsapp Join Channel
Showing Results for : Reset Filters

Refund - Constitutional architecture of CGST Act, 2017, IGST Act...

Court Reviews Constitutional Framework of CGST, IGST Acts; Focus on Section 6 Tax Officer Appointments, Halts Refunds Pending Further Orders.

Contents
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

GST October 29, 2021 Case Laws HC
Refund - Constitutional architecture of CGST Act, 2017, IGST Act 2017, SGST and UGST Acts as well as width, ambit and application of Section 6 of CGST and SGST Acts - Appointment of Central Tax and State Tax officers - Right from the day the final hearing commenced all the aforesaid matters were taken up for hearing together. This Court did not advice any counsel to argue in a particular manner or not to argue at all. It is only when the petitioner concluded their arguments that this Court called upon learned counsel for respondents to argue. Today to state that learned counsel for respondents should confine their arguments to the issue of law - question of law cannot be decided in a vacuum. The facts put forward by the respondents would help the Court in determining the question of law correctly - Till further order, no refund to be granted. - HC

Topics

Acts Income Tax