Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Entitlement to O&M benefits (fiscal benefits covered under Section 26 of the SEZ Act in respect of maintenance and duty free import to raw materials and consumables for generation of power) - whether the condition that no duty free benefits for transfers to EOU is contrary to the SEZ Act and the Rules made thereunder? - The dispute in the present case relates to the direction to re-demarcate the petitioner’s power plant as a non-processing unit for the purposes of the 2009 Guidelines. The direction to re-demarcate is clearly not traceable to Section 26(2) of the SEZ Act. - The present petition is allowed to the limited extent that the condition imposed by Unit Approval Committee of refunding the O&M benefits obtained by the petitioner during the period 01.04.2015 to 15.02.2016 by its letter dated 18.04.2016, is set aside - HC
Entitlement to O&M benefits (fiscal benefits covered under Section 26 of the SEZ Act in respect of maintenance and duty free import to raw materials and consumables for generation of power) - whether the condition that no duty free benefits for transfers to EOU is contrary to the SEZ Act and the Rules made thereunder? - The dispute in the present case relates to the direction to re-demarcate the petitioner’s power plant as a non-processing unit for the purposes of the 2009 Guidelines. The direction to re-demarcate is clearly not traceable to Section 26(2) of the SEZ Act. - The present petition is allowed to the limited extent that the condition imposed by Unit Approval Committee of refunding the O&M benefits obtained by the petitioner during the period 01.04.2015 to 15.02.2016 by its letter dated 18.04.2016, is set aside - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
