Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Income accrued in India - It is also not understood as to how the appellant-Revenue can contend that the respondent-assessee does not have PE in India for the purpose of 201 proceedings in the case of LGEIL but would have a PE as far as its own taxability is concerned for the same Assessment Year. - Moreover, in view of the decision of the Apex Court, the proceedings initiated by the appellant-Revenue has become infructuous and accordingly ex debito justitiae - HC
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Income accrued in India - It is also not understood as to how the appellant-Revenue can contend that the respondent-assessee does not have PE in India for the purpose of 201 proceedings in the case of LGEIL but would have a PE as far as its own taxability is concerned for the same Assessment Year. - Moreover, in view of the decision of the Apex Court, the proceedings initiated by the appellant-Revenue has become infructuous and accordingly ex debito justitiae - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
