Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
Bogus LTCG - onus to prove - Penny stock purchases - Claim made u/s 10(38) denied - ITAT remanded the matter back - Where all the evidence had been produced and the CIT(A), after full investigation of the evidence and examination of the accounts, had given a definite finding on the question in issue, the Tribunal's order of remand was held to be invalid. Substantial questions of law framed are answered in favour of the Revenue - HC
Bogus LTCG - onus to prove - Penny stock purchases - Claim made u/s 10(38) denied - ITAT remanded the matter back - Where all the evidence had been produced and the CIT(A), after full investigation of the evidence and examination of the accounts, had given a definite finding on the question in issue, the Tribunal's order of remand was held to be invalid. Substantial questions of law framed are answered in favour of the Revenue - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
