Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Merchant banker regulation consolidates registration, governance, capital, reporting, outsourcing and investor-protection requirements under an update...
CENVAT Credit - restrictions in using the cenvat credit for payment of duty for the clearances - Pursuant to quashing of Rule 8(3A) by the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court, Govt. have chosen to substitute Rule 8(3A) - As per Rules of interpretation, a procedural law is always deemed to be retrospective, unless the same is categorically or specifically made prospective. Thus, the substituted Rule 8(3A) will have retrospective effect, from the date Central Excise Rules, 2002 came into effect. - AT
CENVAT Credit - restrictions in using the cenvat credit for payment of duty for the clearances - Pursuant to quashing of Rule 8(3A) by the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court, Govt. have chosen to substitute Rule 8(3A) - As per Rules of interpretation, a procedural law is always deemed to be retrospective, unless the same is categorically or specifically made prospective. Thus, the substituted Rule 8(3A) will have retrospective effect, from the date Central Excise Rules, 2002 came into effect. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.