Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Merchant banker regulation consolidates registration, governance, capital, reporting, outsourcing and investor-protection requirements under an update...
Validity of order of Income Tax Settlement Commission [ITSC] - deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e) - The Revenue need not have any apprehension over the income, which was initially disclosed at the time of filing the application under Section 245C of the Act because the said income, which was offered at the first instance was not accepted by the Revenue and a report under Rule 9 of the said Rules was filed and based on that, the Revenue suggested four additions and thereafter, the case was proceeded and the matter was settled. - HC
Validity of order of Income Tax Settlement Commission [ITSC] - deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e) - The Revenue need not have any apprehension over the income, which was initially disclosed at the time of filing the application under Section 245C of the Act because the said income, which was offered at the first instance was not accepted by the Revenue and a report under Rule 9 of the said Rules was filed and based on that, the Revenue suggested four additions and thereafter, the case was proceeded and the matter was settled. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.