Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Refund claim - principles of unjust enrichment - duty of customs was paid @7.5% instead of 5% provisionally - the same has to be returned to the assessee once his books of accounts are showing such an excess duty paid as receivable. The same is the sufficient evidence for the fact that incidence of duty has not been passed on by the assessee/manufacturer from the end customers of the product manufactured. - AT
Refund claim - principles of unjust enrichment - duty of customs was paid @7.5% instead of 5% provisionally - the same has to be returned to the assessee once his books of accounts are showing such an excess duty paid as receivable. The same is the sufficient evidence for the fact that incidence of duty has not been passed on by the assessee/manufacturer from the end customers of the product manufactured. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4790
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
