Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Refund claim - tax liability discharged by the appellant twice - The verification report of the department itself is supporting the appellant’s contention that the same liability has been discharged twice by the appellant once inadvertently in the inactive account, subsequently, in the active account - no other evidence was required to be produced by the appellant. Otherwise also it is a settled law that onus always rests upon the department to prove the allegations raised in the show cause notice - Refund allowed - AT
Refund claim - tax liability discharged by the appellant twice - The verification report of the department itself is supporting the appellant’s contention that the same liability has been discharged twice by the appellant once inadvertently in the inactive account, subsequently, in the active account - no other evidence was required to be produced by the appellant. Otherwise also it is a settled law that onus always rests upon the department to prove the allegations raised in the show cause notice - Refund allowed - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
