Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Merchant banker regulation consolidates registration, governance, capital, reporting, outsourcing and investor-protection requirements under an update...
Refund of amount appropriated during the pendency of appeal before the CESTAT - any claims made as a consequence of Appellate Order/(s) will have to pass through the rigours of (ec) ibid. - The application for refund here is filed on 14.08.2020, which is clearly after the prescribed period of one year from the relevant date as prescribed under (ec) of Explanation (B) to Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and hence, the appellant does not pass through the rigours of the specific provision under (ec) ibid - AT
Refund of amount appropriated during the pendency of appeal before the CESTAT - any claims made as a consequence of Appellate Order/(s) will have to pass through the rigours of (ec) ibid. - The application for refund here is filed on 14.08.2020, which is clearly after the prescribed period of one year from the relevant date as prescribed under (ec) of Explanation (B) to Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and hence, the appellant does not pass through the rigours of the specific provision under (ec) ibid - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
