Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Exemption u/s 10(23C) (vi) - rejection of the application u/s 12AA - allegation of paying interest on unsecured loan to specified persons at higher rate - Whether paying the interest at the rate of 9%/12% to the above then person was a benefit to the specified person, was required to be examined by the AO during the assessment proceedings and for that purposes it was incumbent upon the AO to bring on record the contemporaneous comparative instances of the similar society indicating that the interest of rate paid by the assessee was far more than that was prevailing in the open market. In the light of the above, the first objection raised by the CIT(E) was without any basis. - AT
Exemption u/s 10(23C) (vi) - rejection of the application u/s 12AA - allegation of paying interest on unsecured loan to specified persons at higher rate - Whether paying the interest at the rate of 9%/12% to the above then person was a benefit to the specified person, was required to be examined by the AO during the assessment proceedings and for that purposes it was incumbent upon the AO to bring on record the contemporaneous comparative instances of the similar society indicating that the interest of rate paid by the assessee was far more than that was prevailing in the open market. In the light of the above, the first objection raised by the CIT(E) was without any basis. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
