Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Validity of reasons to believe - non disposing of objections - Change of opinion - As held by the Supreme Court, it is not for the assessee to tell as to how the Assessing Officer has to complete the assessment. - It would be a clear case of change of opinion. What the Assessing Officer purported to do is to review his earlier decision. - proceedings of reopening quashed - HC
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Validity of reasons to believe - non disposing of objections - Change of opinion - As held by the Supreme Court, it is not for the assessee to tell as to how the Assessing Officer has to complete the assessment. - It would be a clear case of change of opinion. What the Assessing Officer purported to do is to review his earlier decision. - proceedings of reopening quashed - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.