Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Food supplement classification requires common parlance and authoritative tests, preventing treatment as proprietary Ayurvedic medicines without suppo...
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Validity of reasons to believe - non disposing of objections - Change of opinion - As held by the Supreme Court, it is not for the assessee to tell as to how the Assessing Officer has to complete the assessment. - It would be a clear case of change of opinion. What the Assessing Officer purported to do is to review his earlier decision. - proceedings of reopening quashed - HC
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Validity of reasons to believe - non disposing of objections - Change of opinion - As held by the Supreme Court, it is not for the assessee to tell as to how the Assessing Officer has to complete the assessment. - It would be a clear case of change of opinion. What the Assessing Officer purported to do is to review his earlier decision. - proceedings of reopening quashed - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.