Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Insolvency and BankruptcyAugust 28, 2021Case LawsAT
Initiation of CIRP - NCLT rejected the application - From the records it is clear that the loan amount has not come to the account of the Respondent Company. The transaction between the Appellant, a partnership firm and the Director of the Respondent Company in his personal capacity. - There is no doubt that the Financial contract means, a contract between a Corporate Debtor and Financial Creditor. However, the MoU dated 05.07.2019 does not fit in this clause, in view of its genuineness, as Questioned by the Respondent. - AT
Initiation of CIRP - NCLT rejected the application - From the records it is clear that the loan amount has not come to the account of the Respondent Company. The transaction between the Appellant, a partnership firm and the Director of the Respondent Company in his personal capacity. - There is no doubt that the Financial contract means, a contract between a Corporate Debtor and Financial Creditor. However, the MoU dated 05.07.2019 does not fit in this clause, in view of its genuineness, as Questioned by the Respondent. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.